Australian civilian hospital nurses’ lived experience of an out-of-hospital environment following a disaster
Various publications and presentations relating to Mass Gathering and Major Event health
Background: Disasters disrupt the fabric of communities. This includes disruption to the healthcare system that supports a disaster-affected community. Nurses are important members of disaster response teams. However, there is limited literature that describes nurses’ roles or experience in responding to disasters.
Objectives: The aim of the study is to understand the concept of disaster preparedness in relation to the intensive care unit through the review and critique of the peer-reviewed literature.
ABSTRACT
Background: Globally, families and communities are impacted by disasters every day. Nurses are integral to assisting in disasters, in the support and enablement of individuals and communities. However, some studies indicate that nurses feel ill-equipped to assist, partially because disaster content is not thoroughly addressed in the undergraduate curriculum. Therefore, nursing schools need to equip undergraduate nursing students with the knowledge and preparation required to assist effectively during and/or following a disaster.
Background: Hospitals play a critical role as a frontline agency in disasters, with staff often working within extraordinary circumstances in these facilities to deliver care. This study was inspired by the authors’ interdisciplinary experiences in health and resilience engineering. Observing increasing dialogue about how hospitals could improve their resilience to disasters we sought to understand the construct of ‘hospital resilience during disasters’ and how it could be improved.
Method: The study involved a systematic literature review of publications related to hospital resilience during disasters, conducted at the end of January 2020. Of the 553 articles found initially, 49 remained after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Quality appraisal tools designed for different types of research were used.
Results: The findings are described using language and constructs drawn from the Plan-Prepare-Respond-Recover (PPRR) discourse and Resilience Engineering Theory. The review found broad consensus that staff awareness, education, and training about disaster-related plans needs to be improved. The articles documented a wide variety of approaches to evaluating hospital resilience to disasters, wherein the importance of infrastructure and organisational resilience is clear. This included insightful guidance for developing, disseminating, communicating, and implementing disaster plans.
Conclusion: Through distilling the literature review findings, we propose a ‘Decision-Support Model for Disaster Resilient Hospitals’ to foster proactive and systemic improvements, from anticipating to managing and monitoring organisational performance during disasters. We also propose a hybrid of two methods towards a more holistic evaluation of hospital disaster resilience. The findings have immediate implications for supporting hospital leadership strategically and operationally.
Wardrop R, Crilly J, Ranse J, Chaboyer W. (2020). Vulnerability: A concept synthesis and its application to the Emergency Department (ED). International Emergency Nursing.
ABSTRACT
Background: Emergency departments (EDs) are often first to feel the intra-hospital effects of disasters. Compromised care standards during disasters eventuate from increased demands on health resources; the facilities, supplies, equipment and manpower imperative for a functioning healthcare facility. Emergency departments must understand the effect of disasters on their health resources. This paper examines the impact on resources within the ED as a result of a disaster and provides a review against the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction’s Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 priorities.
Method: An integrative literature review design was utilised. Articles were extracted from databases and search engines. The Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Guidelines for systematic literature reviews were used.
Results: Seven papers met inclusion criteria. Disaster consumable stocking was used to mitigate disaster risk and improve resilience. Logistical challenges were exacerbated by poor building design. Ineffective human resource management, communications failure, insufficient ED space, diminished equipment and supplies and unreliable emergency power sources were described.
Conclusions: Disaster planning and preparedness strategies can address health resource deficits, increasing ED resilience. Further retrospective case studies are required to greater understand the effects of disasters on ED health resources.
REFERENCE: